How Bringing Your Own Bottle became London’s Tactical Gourmet Dining Strategy

Monday night at Hawksmoor Air Street, and someone has brought along a 1996 Pommard. They’re paying £5 corkage on top of the £30 they probably paid en primeur nearly 30 years ago, instead of the equivalent £200+ it would cost if the restaurant had it on its list today (which it doesn’t). The wine list sits unopened. At the next table, a couple set down a supermarket Barolo. The room is full on a Monday because corkage has turned what used to be the quietest night of the week into something resembling a ritual.

Three decades+ ago, I was doing something similar at my first BYOB experience, though the circumstances were different. Leeds University Wine Society, 1990-94. Sunday nights after our tastings, we’d walk across to Nafees with whatever bottles needed finishing. No corkage charge, cheap glasses, instant wine education. Same behaviour pattern as Hawksmoor, completely different world.

Some of us went into the wine trade. Now in London, we still meet for dinners at BYOB restaurants – Thai places in Croydon, Caribbean spots in Brixton, Ethiopian cafés in Dalston, as well as a good steak, of course. And the occasional curry. Our habit might have stuck, but London’s BYOB landscape has changed considerably over the past 30 years that we’ve been meeting up. More options, more cuisines, more geographic spread, and more premium restaurants as part of the mix. A great opportunity for us to share some of our discoveries. What started as a workaround for unlicensed family restaurants has become a strategic choice for collectors and a yield management tool for premium venues.

This is the story of how that happened, and what’s happening to the restaurants that made it normal.

The Foundations

BYOB in London didn’t start as a dining strategy. It started as a workaround for restaurants that couldn’t get alcohol licences, didn’t want them, or couldn’t afford them.

Brick Lane in the 1970s was full of small Bangladeshi curry houses run by Sylheti families, most of which operated without licences. Some couldn’t navigate the bureaucracy, others didn’t want to sell alcohol for religious reasons, and for many, the cost and complexity weren’t worth it when customers were happy enough to bring cans from the off-licence next door. As one second-generation restaurateur put it: “We couldn’t afford licences. Even if we could, the council didn’t want to give them to immigrants running cheap cafés.”

Sheba opened in 1974 and still operates on the same basis – unlicensed and BYOB. Through the 1970s and 80s, Brick Lane became synonymous with cheap curry and bringing your own lager, discovered by students and post-pub crowds who found that BYOB was just accepted as normal. “People brought their own because we didn’t sell it,” one owner remembers. “It wasn’t a policy. It was just how things were.”

The off-licences were often migrant-run as well, which created a community-based loop: money circulated locally rather than leaking out to larger operators. Students would buy their cans next door, walk into the restaurant, and nobody questioned it. “Students made Brick Lane famous,” another restaurateur recalls. “They’d walk in with a bottle from the off-licence and think nothing of it.”

A similar pattern emerged on Kingsland Road in Hackney from the 1980s onwards, where Vietnamese families (many of them refugees from 1975) opened small cafés serving pho and family recipes. Most were unlicensed, and what became known as the Pho Mile attracted students, artists and people priced out of central London. “When you flee your country, food is your memory,” one owner explains. “We cooked what we knew. Licensing was expensive. English paperwork was impossible. Customers brought their own, and we welcomed it.”

The restaurants were cooking bun bo hue (spicy beef noodle soup from central Vietnam), ca kho to (caramelised fish in claypots), banh xeo (crispy turmeric crepes) – regional dishes rather than tourist pho – because they were cooking for diaspora communities first and locals second.

The same thing happened across other migrant corridors. Green Lanes with Turkish and Kurdish ocakbaşı restaurants, many halal and unlicensed, grilling proper Adana kebab over charcoal mangals and making kunefe with cheese that actually pulls. “Halal norms meant no alcohol,” one Turkish restaurant owner says. “BYOB solved the problem. Locals liked bringing wine. It became social more than commercial.”

These weren’t restaurants making branding decisions; they were family businesses operating within tight margins where an alcohol licence made no economic or cultural sense. For many Muslim-run kitchens, “we do not sell alcohol” wasn’t just a constraint – it was a cultural boundary and a statement of identity. BYOB allowed them to stay true to religious values whilst still welcoming a diverse customer base.

BYOB spread because unlicensed restaurants needed customers, and customers wanted to drink. “BYOB kept us alive,” one Brick Lane restaurateur explains. “We ran on tiny margins.” This mutual accommodation, born of exclusion and thrift, accidentally created something powerful. On this neutral, affordable social ground, community members, students, and later explorers could meet over food that would otherwise be inaccessible to them. It was an ecosystem built on necessity, but it generated a culture of its own.

The Translation

Something shifted in the 1990s. BYOB stopped being just a local fact and became a London-wide consumer concept, and the people responsible were food writers.

Fay Maschler in the Evening Standard, Jonathan Meades, Time Out’s “Cheap Eats” guides – they didn’t just report on Brick Lane and Kingsland Road, they performed a cultural translation. “No licence” became “no markup”. “Rough cafés” became “cool gems”. “Family-run” became “authentic”. What had been a workaround born from necessity and cultural identity was recoded as an insider tip, a clever hack for people who knew better than to pay restaurant wine list prices.

A typical 1990s Time Out entry didn’t say “family-run café with no alcohol licence”. It said something closer to: “Forget the markup – bring your own bottle to this hidden gem for the most authentic Vietnamese cooking outside Hanoi.” The constraint was repackaged as the insider’s advantage.

This was the hinge moment between two eras of BYOB. The media prepared Londoners to see bringing your own bottle as something clever rather than merely tolerated by restaurants with no other option. It normalised the behaviour beyond immigrant districts and made it feel like a smart choice rather than a constraint that someone else had to work around.

The effect was real. Students who’d never have ventured to Brick Lane started making weekend trips. Young professionals discovered the Pho Mile. The restaurants themselves didn’t change – they were still cooking the same food, still operating on the same tight margins, still unlicensed – but the clientele broadened considerably. What had been community dining became adventurous dining, at least in the eyes of people reading restaurant columns.

The restaurant critics made BYOB respectable for diners. Wine publications made it respectable for collectors. Through the 2000s, Decanter, Wine Spectator, and writers like Tim Atkin MW began publishing guides to corkage-friendly restaurants, explicitly framing BYOB as a sophisticated strategy rather than a cost-cutting measure. This wasn’t just about where to eat cheaply – it was about where serious wine people could bring their best bottles without being made to feel awkward. The wine world’s endorsement completed the cultural translation that restaurant critics had started.

This created the cultural foundation that would later allow independent wine merchants in the 2000s to push BYOB as a lifestyle choice, and eventually permit premium restaurants like Hawksmoor to offer strategic corkage without seeming cheap. The media had done the work of making BYOB respectable first.

Who Benefits

The students who discovered Brick Lane and Kingsland Road in the 1980s and 90s grew up. They became professionals with careers, and some even joined the wine and hospitality industries. The people who couldn’t afford restaurant wine lists thirty years ago now have cellars or, at the very least, access to fine wine at the click of a button. BYOB travelled with them, but the meaning changed. What started as collective experimentation – trying unfamiliar food with whatever bottle you could afford – became something closer to individual curation, a performance of discernment rather than discovery.

London now has more BYOB options than at any point in its history. More cuisines, more geographic spread, more flexibility in how corkage works depending on whether you’re dealing with unlicensed family businesses or licensed restaurants deploying it strategically. The culture those early Brick Lane and Kingsland Road restaurants built has gone citywide, which represents genuine democratisation in one sense. You can bring decent bottles to Kurdish mezze in Harringay, West African chop bars in Peckham, family-run French bistros in the suburbs, not just the established migrant corridors.

Forty years ago, if you wanted to eat proper shatkora beef curry (made with the sharp citrus fruit from Sylhet), you flew to Bangladesh. Bhuna khichuri wasn’t something curry houses served to British customers – it was comfort food cooked at home. The Vietnamese cafés weren’t offering ca kho to or bun bo hue, and finding proper Adana kebab cooked over charcoal required a trip to Turkey. Now you can eat all of these within a few miles of each other in London, often at restaurants where BYOB removes the financial barrier to trying something completely unfamiliar. Migration made these cuisines local, but BYOB made exploration affordable.

But the original clusters aren’t what they used to be. Brick Lane has fewer Bengali curry houses than it did 20 years ago. Kingsland Road’s Vietnamese strip has thinned out. The economic model that allowed those restaurants to flourish in the 1970s and 80s doesn’t function the same way under current conditions – rising rents, higher business rates, tighter employment and immigration rules. The rise of supermarket wine killed many of the small off-licences that had sat next door to BYOB restaurants, breaking the community economy loop that had kept money circulating locally. The 2007 smoking ban didn’t help either – pubs lost their smoking identity and pivoted hard into food, creating direct competition with BYOB venues that had previously occupied a different social space.

“My parents built this street on BYOB because they had no choice,” says one second-generation Brick Lane restaurateur. “Now landlords want triple the rent. We love our heritage, but the old curry-house model is dying. A lot of the BYOB places won’t survive another cycle.”

The cycle was self-consuming: media celebration legitimised the corridor for a broader audience; that audience’s spending attracted speculative capital; that capital priced out the original social and economic relations. The very act of celebrating these spaces as “finds” set in motion the market forces that would unmoor them from their foundations. “We didn’t know this street would become famous,” a Kingsland Road café owner recalls. “Then the gastropubs arrived. Now the pressure is huge.”

BYOB’s mainstream success has accelerated the disappearance of the very communities that created it. The Monday night scene at Hawksmoor is the polished endpoint of a process that gutted the restaurants on Kingsland Road, which made the behaviour desirable in the first place.

What Gets Preserved

The wine world’s adoption of BYOB happened gradually through the 2000s and accelerated dramatically after the pandemic. Independent merchants like Theatre of Wine, Tannin & Oak, Lea & Sanderman, Jeroboams, Bottle Apostle, and Hedonism weren’t just selling cellar-worthy bottles; they were actively encouraging customers to bring them to restaurants. En primeur purchases and direct-to-consumer sales meant more fine wine was bypassing restaurant lists entirely, forcing restaurants to choose: either accept BYOB or lose the customers who’d invested in those bottles.

Collectors prefer BYOB for several reasons. Some worry about provenance – whether bottles have been exposed to temperature fluctuations, vibration, or light during storage or service. BYOB gives them complete control over the chain of custody from merchant to table.

But it’s also about doing justice to special bottles. That anniversary gift, that 1982 Château Margaux you’ve been cellaring for years – it deserves either a three-Michelin-star kitchen or one of the best steaks you’ll ever eat. The wine deserves Hawksmoor’s steak expertise or The Ledbury’s fine dining precision, not your best attempts at home cooking following a YouTube tutorial. This is about recognising that truly great wine needs truly great food to show what it’s capable of.

Sommeliers have mixed feelings about this. They enjoy tasting interesting bottles and engaging with knowledgeable diners, and they’re generally happy to sell cocktails and dessert wines alongside whatever someone’s brought. What they dislike is cheap supermarket wine being used to undercut their lists, or entitled behaviour from people who think paying corkage entitles them to extra service without spending anything else. There’s an unspoken rule that operates at serious restaurants – your bottle should be more interesting than the equivalent on their list. This functions as a cultural capital test. In this way, BYOB had been reinvented as a new kind of exclusive club, with its own unspoken entry fee.

Premium restaurants started offering strategic corkage because it works as yield management. Mondays used to be dead. Hawksmoor’s £5 Monday corkage and Gaucho’s free Monday policy turn soft nights into destination evenings. The maths is straightforward – a table spending £80 on food plus £5 corkage is considerably better than an empty table. The pandemic accelerated this. Restaurants needed to fill rooms without permanently discounting food prices, and corkage was the lever that gave value without devaluing the core product. Some of these deals became sticky – once customers expect Monday corkage, removing it becomes difficult.

But what exactly is being preserved here? For collectors bringing a 1996 Pommard to Hawksmoor, it’s about provenance, value, bottle condition, and personal cellar prestige. For the migrant BYOB restaurants that normalised the behaviour decades earlier, it was about preserving community, cultural boundaries, access to hospitality, and economic survival. The modern ritual is about individual curation. The original was about collective exploration – in my case, my student days at Nafees, learning what Riesling did with vindaloo, not performing knowledge I already had.

Two parallel BYOB cultures now operate in London. Migrant BYOB remains rooted in necessity, cultural identity and survival, still operating unlicensed with free BYOB but facing existential pressure from rising costs and no ability to offset through corkage revenue or alcohol sales. Premium BYOB operates as a strategy, identity and insider knowledge, deployed by restaurants with the flexibility to adjust pricing and use it as a brand signal. These cultures rarely interact. One is curating a liquid asset. The other is fighting for its life. They share a history, but they are no longer in the same story.

What Remains Unresolved

BYOB has completed a remarkable journey. From bringing warm lager to Brick Lane curry houses in the 1970s to £100 corkage at The Dorian in Notting Hill, from migrant necessity to middle-class strategy. But calling it evolution suggests progress in a direction that benefits everyone. The reality is more complicated than that.

The restaurants feeling economic pressure most acutely are the unlicensed ones – the family businesses operating on tight margins with free BYOB and no mechanism to generate revenue from alcohol or adjust corkage strategically. Licensed restaurants can charge £25 on Tuesdays and drop it to free on Mondays, using flexibility as a tool. Unlicensed restaurants absorb rising costs with no equivalent lever to pull. The delivery app economy has made this worse, removing the takeaway margin that used to cross-subsidise dine-in service whilst simultaneously breaking the customer relationships those restaurants relied on.

The smoking ban in 2007, the Licensing Act changes, post-Brexit staffing constraints, and the death of small off-licences – each of these shifts individually would have created pressure. Together, they’ve made the original BYOB model increasingly difficult to sustain. New residential developments near established BYOB corridors generate noise complaints, making it harder to obtain licences, even for restaurants that want to evolve. The same gentrification that raised their profile now restricts their options.

Meanwhile, BYOB remains a thriving concept. More cuisines, more areas, more premium venues strategically offering it. The culture has spread citywide exactly as the communities that built it come under increasing strain. Whether this represents appropriation or evolution depends partly on who’s answering and partly on whether the original operators survive long enough to benefit from BYOB’s current prestige.

Some questions don’t resolve neatly. Did media discovery ultimately destroy the spaces it celebrated? Is modern BYOB preserving the wrong thing – the wine rather than the culture? Has it shifted from democratisation to performance? When BYOB becomes corkage, what happens to the principle of access? Can the original BYOB corridors survive the forces unleashed by their own popularity?

The couple at Hawksmoor with their Pommard and the family running an unlicensed Kurdish restaurant in Harringay are both participating in BYOB culture. One exercises a curated choice to elevate a luxury experience. The other operates within a non-negotiable constraint that defines their business’s precarious existence. One pays a nominal fee for a privilege. The other offers a lifeline for free. Both are bringing their own bottles. Only one of them could ever afford to leave theirs at home.

Alastair Cassie
Founder, BYOB City Guides™

Our London BYOB 2026 guide is now live (online e-book). 180+ listings, live, pinned Google map, wine pairing guides and weekly updates.

Purchase the guide here. Use code BLOG20 for 20% off.